澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询

Watch These SMH ETF Price Levels Amid Chip Sector Selloff

Fund Slumped By More Than 7% on Tuesday

Source: TradingView.com.

Key Takeaways

  • The VanEck Semiconductor ETF remains in the spotlight on Wednesday after tumbling more than 7% yesterday to register its largest daily percentage decline since March 2020 amid a broad-based selloff in chip stocks.
  • A relief rally in the fund recently stalled at the 50-day moving average, with Tuesday’s drop taking place on the highest daily volume since early August, pointing to conviction behind the move from larger market participants.
  • Amid further weakness in the ETF's price, investors should monitor key chart levels at $217, $200, $176, and $161.

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) remains in the spotlight on Wednesday after tumbling more than 7% yesterday to register its largest daily percentage decline since March 2020 amid a broad-based selloff in chip stocks. The top-weighted stock in the fund, 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:artificial intelligence (AI) darling Nvidia (NVDA), led the sell-off, slumping nearly 10%, while other leading chipmakers in the ETF’s 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:portfolio, including Intel (INTC), Marvell Technology (MRVL) and Micron (MU), all dropped by around 8%.

The chips sector has seen significant gains over the past year, as AI’s widespread adoption bolsters demand. 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:Volatility across the group has increased in recent trading sessions after Nvidia reported earnings that topped Wall Street estimates but showed that 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:growth is slowing.

Below, we’ll take a closer look at the ETF's chart and use 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:technical analysis to identify important levels to watch out fo🍬r amid increasing price fluctuations in c🔯hip stocks.

Recovery Stalls at 50-Day Moving Average

Since forming a 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:double top in June and July, the fund’s price suffered a significant 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:correction before stag♏ing a relief rally from the closely-watched 200-day moving average (MA).

However, more recently, investors resumed selling on a retracement to the 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:50-day MA, with Tuesday’s drop taking place on the highest daily 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:trading volume since early August, pointing to convict🍨ion behind the move from larger market participants.

Aꩵfter falling 7.5% on Tuesday, S🀅MH was down another 1.4% to $222.00 in premarket trading Wednesday at around 7:15 a.m. ET.

Monitor These Key Chart Levels

Looking ahead, invest꧙ors should eye four key price levels on the ETF’s 🐭chart that could prove pivotal if weakness across the chip sector continues. 

The first sits around $217, a level on the chart where the fund could find initial support near the March pullback low, which also currently closely align🍎s with the rising 200-day MA and a range of trading activity positioned near last month’s low.

A 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:breakdown below this level could see the ETF’s price decline to the $200 area, where it may encounter buying interest around the prominent April and August troughs. Last month’s low marks a technically important level, given the fund’s significant intraday reversal from this chart region.

The next lower price level to watch lies at $176, a location where the ETF could attract support from the December high that formed early in the stock’s up-trending move from October to March.

A more protracted correction may see the ETF revisit lower support around $161. This area could entice longer-term 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:buy-and-hold investors seeking 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:entry points near a range of comparable trading levels on the cha�꧃�rt between July and December last year.

The comments, opinions, and analyses expressed on Investopedia are for informational purposes only. Read our 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:warranty and liability disclaimer for more info.

As of the date this article was written, the author does not own any of the above securities.

Do you have a news tip for Investopedia reporters? Please email us at
Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. CNBC. "."

  2. ETF.com. "."

Compare Accounts
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.

Related Articles