澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询

Permanent Income Hypothesis: Definition, How It Works, and Impact

Permanent Income Hypothesis: A theory of consumer spending stating that people will spend money at a level consistent with their expected long-term average income.

Investopedia / Jiaqi Zhou

Definition
The permanent income hypothesis is a theory of consumer spending that people spend money at a level consistent with their expected long-term average incomes.

What Is the Permanent Income Hypothesis?

The permanent income hypothesis is a theory of consumer spending stating that people will spend money at a level consistent with their expected long-term average income. The level of expected long-term income then becomes thought of as the level of “permanent” income that can be safely spent. A worker will only save if their current income is higher than the anticipate✤d level of permanent income, in order to guard against future declines in income.

Key Takeaways

  • The permanent income hypothesis states that individuals will spend money at a level that is consistent with their expected long-term average income.
  • Milton Friedman developed the permanent income hypothesis, believing that consumer spending is a result of estimated future income as opposed to consumption that is based on current after-tax income.
  • Under the theory, if economic policies result in increased income, it will not necessarily translate into increased consumer spending.
  • An individual's liquidity is a factor in their management of income and spending.

Understanding the Permanent Income Hypothesis

The permanent income hypothesis was formulated by the Nobel Prize-winning economist 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:Milton Friedman in 1957. The hypothesis implies that changes in consumption behavior are not predictable because they are based on individual expectations. This has broad implications concerning economic policy.

According to this theory, even if economic policies are successful in increasing income, the policies may not kick off a 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:multiplier effect in regards to increased consumer spending. Rather, the theory predicts that there will not be an uptick in 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:consumer spending until workers reform expectatꦕions about their future incomes.

Milton believed that people will consume based on an estimate of their future income as opposed to 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:Keynesian economics, which proposes that people will consume based on their after-tax income at that moment. Milton's basis was that individuals prefer to smooth their consumption rather than let it bounce arou💧nd as a result of short-term fluctuatiꦡons in income.

Spending Habits Under the 𒉰Permanent Income Hypothesis

If a worker is aware that they are likely to receive an income bonus at the end of a particular pay period, it is plausible that the worker’s spending in adva💮nce of that bonus may change in anticipation of the additional earnings. However, it is also possible that wor🐻kers may choose not to increase their spending based solely on a short-term windfall. They may instead make efforts to increase their savings, based on the expected boost in income.

Something similar can be said of individuals who are informed that they are to receive an 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:inheritance. Their personal expenditures could chang🐷e to take advantage of the anticipated influx of funds, but per this theory, they may maintain their current spending levels in order to save the supplemental assets. Or, they may seek to invest those supplemental funds to 🃏provide long-term growth of their money rather than spend it immediately on disposable products and services.

Liquidity and the Permanent Income Hypothesis

The 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:liquidity of the individual can play a role in future income expectations. Individꦺuals with no assets may already be in the habit of spending without regard to their income; current or future.

Changes over time, however—through incremental salary raises𓆏 or the assumption of new long-term jobs that bring higher, sustained pay—ca💙n lead to changes in permanent income. With their expectations elevated, employees may allow their expenditures to scale up in turn.

What Is the Difference Between Life Cycle Income Hypothesis and Permanent Income Hypothesis?

The 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:life cycle hypothesis focuses on how the spending and saving habits of an individual changes within their lifetime, or life cycle, as they grow older. On the other hand, the permanent income hypothesis examines an individual's spending habits based on expected income, and it applies at any point during their lifetimes.

What Is the Difference Between Permanent Income and Transitory Income?

As the name suggests, transitory income is a temporary, unexpected change in income generally from incons🦩istent sources. Meanwhile, permanent income is the expected average income of an individual that remain🍌s stable over a long period of time.

How Much Does the Average American Spend on Non-essentials?

According to a survey conducted by OnePoll, the average American spends around $1,497 a month on non-essentials, totaling nearly $18,000 a year.

The Bottom Line

Th💎e permanent income hypothesis, by Milton Friedman, states that consumers spend money based on their expected long-term average income, meaning that economic policies aiming to increase consumer spending may not be successful a♐t first due to the stability of individual expectations.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. University of Chicago, Harris School of Public Policy. "."

  2. Ladder. "."

Related Articles