澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询

Here's How Retirement Experts Say to Make the '4% Rule' Work For You

Illustration of dollar bills, retirement, 4% and question marks

Investopedia / Photo Illustration 🅠by Alice Morgan /♏ Getty Images

Key Takeaways

  • Rule-of-thumb guidelines about withdrawals and expected returns are the basis of many Americans’ retirement plans. But experts say it can pay to look deeply into the details. 
  • One example: The 4% rule, which estimates how much someone should withdraw from their nest egg each year to fund their retirement.
  • Experts said it's a good general rule, but it can pay to look more closely at assumptions about withdrawals and expected market returns.

𝓀Rule-of-thumb guidelines about withdrawals and expected returns are the basis of many Americans’ retir🔥ement plans. But experts say it can pay to look deeply into the details. 

One example: the 4% rule, which assumes that someone who withdraws 4% of their nest egg in 📖their first year of retirement, 𝓡then adjusts that amount annually for inflation, will have enough money to last 30 years.  

UBS in a summer study analyzed its clients'澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询: 60/40 portfolios, an investing model that allocates 60% to stocks and 40% to fixed-income investments and that has recently returned to favor after coming 澳洲幸运5开奖号码历史查询:under fire in 2022. The bank estimated that annualized future returns for such portfolios will be 5.9%, three percentage points lower than were seen over the past 30 years.

Assuming those retu🏅rns and a 2.4% inflation rate, according to UBS, retirees would need to withdraw between 4.1% (for a more conservative portfolio) to 4.5% (for a more aggressive 𒈔one) to fund a retirement with an 85% chance of having enough money for 30 years. 

“Stock market valuations, interest rates, and earnings growth expectations are less attractive, while we expect market volatility to be about the same as it was historically,” the researchers wrote. “This means that we need to take historical analyses—like those used to originally come up with the so-called '4% rule'—with a grain of salt.”

The Rule Has a Place–If Used Carefully

Experts say the 4% rule is handy if retirees don’t over-rely on it. David Flores Wilson, a managing Partner at Sincerus Advisory, says it is helpf🌱ul when used alongside other vari💟ables. 

“There's no substitute for doing the math, and that means trying to understand what people's spending levels are, what their expected income sources and assets will be in retirement, and then running projections [that include] assumptions about inflation and market returns,” Wilson said. 

The average annual expenses for 65-74 year olds in 2022 stood at $60,844, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Using the 4% rule, someone expecting to spend about $60,000 a year in retirement would need about $1.5 million, while at $40,000 a year you’d need roughly $1 million. (These basic calculations are for illustration and don't account for inflation.)

But a higher withdrawal rate doesn't necessarily mean you need to save more. That number doesn’t take into effect possible variations in a portfolio’s performance in a specific time period. 

Scott Sturgeon, CFP and founder of Oread Wealth Investors, said that while investors with more aggressive portfolios could experience more substantial gains, they also have a greater prob🅘ability of experiencing drawdowns that increase their risk of running out of money in retirement.

And Jason Siperstein, President and Wealth Advisor at Eliot Rose, noted that ✤many𓆏 of his clients don’t adhere to fixed withdrawal rates in retirement: They’re usually higher early on, he said, rising as high as 8%, before falling as low as 2% once Social Security payments begin. 

“There’s more nuance to doing this than simply looking at the initial portfolio va🦄lue and assuming you can withdraw 4% of that amount each year in perpetuity,” Sturgeon said.

Do you have a news tip for Investopedia reporters? Please email us at
Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. UBS Wealth Management. ""

  2. Financial Planning Association. "."

Related Articles